Blind Man’s Vision Restored After 43 Years: Recovery of sense shows sight is more than visual recognition
Holland Sentinel, August 25, 2003
“After 43 years of blindness, Michael May can see again. He can play soccer with his sons, enjoy movies and, for the first time, gaze on the Sierra Nevada slopes he has expertly skied – sightless – since the late 1970s. But May can’t recognize his sons, Carson, 11, and Wyndham, 9, by their faces alone. The same goes for identifying Jennifer, his wife of 15 years.
“People ‘can’t fathom that,’ said May, who owns a company in Davis, Calif., that makes navigational software for the blind. Three years after surgery restored sight to May’s right eye, researchers say May’s case shows how vision is more than just eye function. Blindness has long-term -effects on how the brain processes information and constructs one’s view of the world.
“May lost his sight to a chemical explosion when he was 3 1/2 years old. He eventually lost his left eye and remained blind in his right after surgery in 2000. But testing since that surgery has showed that May’s ability to interpret what he sees through his good eye is decidedly mixed, said Ione Fine, lead author of a study appearing in the September issue of the journal Nature Neuroscience.
“May can identify simple shapes and colors. He can interpret objects in motion. He can spy faraway peaks. He marvels at the vibrancy of plants and flowers unseen since he lost his vision. But three-dimensional perception and the ability to recognize complex objects such as the faces of family and friends remain severely impaired. He strains to tell the difference between a man and a woman. He describes a cube as a square with extra lines.
“Written history mentions perhaps 30 people who reacquired vision after protracted periods of blindness, said Fine, a neuroscientist at the University of California, San Diego. She and her colleagues leapt at the chance to study May and began testing him just months after his cornea- and stem cell-implant surgery. The stem cells formed a protective layer over his new cornea to prevent clouding. ‘There has always been this question: What would happen if a blind man got his vision back? Is it something innate or is it something we learn from first principles?’ Fine asked. ‘Is it something that happens or is it something we learn, like language?”
“Repeatedly, the researchers combined vision tests with scans of May’s brain activity to study how blindness had affected him. Since May’s ability to recognize complex forms showed impairment, it suggested that region is much slower to mature, Fine said. Once deprived of visual experience, it likely ceases to develop and languishes, she added.
“Since humans constantly encounter novel objects and new faces – and aging in familiar faces – the processing region in the brain must remain flexible, Fine said.
“May agreed with Fine’s theory that vision, like language, appeared to be a skill honed through experience.
“‘I will never be fluent visually, but I get better the more I work at it,'” he said.
All this lends credibility to the two-stage healing of a blind man in Mark 8:22ff. When Jesus restores the man’s sight, it isn’t completely restored: people “look like trees walking around.” They are simply vertical shapes that move. So Jesus has to go at the problem a second time in order for the man to be able to read those moving, vertical shapes as people.